[Nameplate] Overcast ~ 62°F  
Flash Flood Watch
Thursday, Nov. 26, 2015

Continuance granted in 150th District Rep. election hearing

Friday, November 30, 2012

A continuance of the hearing relating to the 150th District Missouri Representative election was sustained until December 3, following the approval of Judge William H. Winchester III.

Judge Winchester was assigned to hear the case regarding the petition filed by Dunklin County Prosecuting Attorney Stephen P. Sokoloff on behalf of County Clerk Carol Hinesly pertaining to a new election in the 150th District of the Missouri House of Representatives.

The hearing is in reference to the Dunklin County Prosecuting Attorney Stephen P. Sokoloff, acting on behalf of County Clerk Carol Hinesly, who filed a petition Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2012, in the County Circuit Court seeking a new election in the 150th District of the Missouri House of Representatives.

Sokoloff's petition alleges that there were sufficient mis-votes in the General Election, held Nov. 6, to call into question the validity of the results.

According to a written statement by the prosecutor, from a preliminary canvass performed by Hinesly, it appears that a number of voters who live in the 152nd District were given ballots to vote in the 150th District and a number of voters in the 150th District were given ballots for the 152th District.

"Because of changes in the district boundaries, there were many voters in the county whose district changed," Sokoloff wrote in his release. "They all continued to vote at the same precincts as they had previously, however. It appears that the registration books may have incorrectly identified which district they lived in, resulting in incorrect ballots being distributed."

Sokoloff said the petition was filed in accordance with Missouri Revised Statutes Section 115.600, which provides that in the event the Election Authority is convinced that "errors of omission or commission occurred on the part of the election authority, election judges, or any election personnel in the conduct of an election, may petition the Circuit Court for a recount or a new election and the court is authorized to order a new election if the evidence provided demonstrates that the irregularities were sufficient to cast doubt on the outcome of the election."

Hinesly has indicated that no other races appear to have been affected by the errors.

The 150th District seat was battled between Kent Hampton (R-Malden) and Tom Todd (D-Campbell), in this year's election.

According to the uncertified preliminary election results, Hampton narrowly defeated Todd 50.5 percent to 49.5 percent. Hinesly said this race will remain uncertified until a decision is made on how to proceed.

The continued hearing is scheduled for Monday, December 3, 2012, at 9 a.m., at the Dunklin County Courthouse in Kennett. Judge Winchester III will be presiding over the case.

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on dddnews.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

How can the taxpayers recoup the cost of this bureaucratic bumbling?

-- Posted by cottonman on Fri, Nov 30, 2012, at 3:24 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: