Sears
Kennett, Missouri · Tuesday, February 9, 2010
[Nameplate] Fair ~ 20°F  
High: 25°F ~ Low: 17°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (3) Share link

Post-trial reactions

Saturday, November 21, 2009
Following the defendant accepting the plea bargain, Kennett Police Chief Barry Tate said that he was glad it was over for the officers, City of Kennett, and himself.

"I was surprised by the last minute plea deal, and am not sure the punishment is quite what I was expecting for last the three years," Tate said.

He added that he considered it a win for the city and the officers and that he stood by them all along.

"I am proud of the officers," Tate said.

Tate noted that the city had to endure slander, especially in the last three months.

He added that the rallies hosted were saying the city was racist and he didn't like it.

"We are not racist and don't treat people different by color," Tate said.

He explained that the department will continue to their job, to the best of their ability.

Kennett Police Officer and witness for the prosecution Phillip Caldwell noted that it had been a long three years.

He added that he had listened to the slander on the news and the accusations made.

"Everything showed what they say happened didn't," Caldwell said.

He explained that they tried to make the city and county look bad when it isn't.

Caldwell said that he would continue to do his job the same way and that he was glad that the city and general public stood behind the officers.

Prosecuting Attorney Morley Swingle said

that he wanted the public to see that

if you resist arrest something will happen.

He noted that the punishment fit the crime

for the first time offender.

"To me, this is a good result in this place," Swingle said. "I don't think anybody wanted to see her go to prison or spend a long time in jail."

He added that he believe it had "dogged on" for three years because both sides were adamant about their position.

Swingle also noted that Sokoloff was never seeking prison time in the plea he had offered earlier.

"I think she deserves credit for admitting to the peace disturbance and resisting arrest," Swingle said.

He explained that the police officers were all satisfied with the exact plea deal when the offer was made last week.

"I think the officers are satisfied," Swingle said.

He added that because of things said by people not apart of the case, the reputation of the community had been damaged to some degree.

Swingle said that he believed Kennett was like any other town in the United States and that it was not a racist environment.

"I felt this is what I would do for the typical person, who was a first time offender," Swingle said.

Following the trial the defendant Heather Ellis shared her thoughts on the case and her enter of guilt regarding two of the charges she faced.

Ellis said, "I was responsible for my actions and able to say that I did wrong."

She noted that it was now time for everybody else to step up to the plate and admit that they did wrong.

Ellis added that, during cross-examinations, the public found out that she did not "break in line" and that she was actually shoved first by Kinder.

She explained that the public also learned that she did not yell or curse.

"I was speaking loud in tone, as I do always," Ellis said.

She noted that she thought that it was important that her story got out and that people understand the truth.

"If I would have signed the plea bargain before, I wouldn't have had the opportunity to led the world know," Ellis said.

She noted that the witnesses, giving reports of her cursing, were not telling the truth and that they had all been schooled on what to say.

"We didn't even use racism as part of our angle because we know the area we are dealing with and know that there had already been a lot of publicity about that," Ellis said. "The prosecutor, in closing statement, actually introduced race as something. This gives me a clear mind and I know the story came out and I feel good about that."

Ellis' attorney Scott Rosenblum answered questions from the media regarding

whether the case was 'win or lose' for Ellis.

Rosenblum said, "I think it's a win. [Ellis] wanted it all brought out to broad daylight and it has been."

He noted that the defense's information showed that the jury was "obviously" going back and forth.

"I have gotten to know this lady in the last couple of months and she is strong lady, a brave lady, and incredibly intelligent," Rosenblum said. "She has many different varied interests and I would predict that she will be a successful teacher and go on to medical school and be a successful doctor."


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on dddnews.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

I'm so glad this is over. And that it is behind us is a "win" for sure. However, the broader experience was a loss for all concerned. Ellis lost her clean police record and credibility. Her pastor father vainly talked about eating the Bible with no grease on it on national TV, no less. The city lost standing as networks like CNN repeatedly portrayed us as a "racially charged community." The police lost esteem for poor exhibitions of conflict resolution and proper restraint techniques (sadly contributing to injuries to the officers), and the court system for taking so incredibly long to resolve such a petty offense. Wal-Mart appears as a less safe place to do business. Various esteemed organizations seeking an end to racism looked foolish nationwide.

Maybe, just maybe, some lawyers and some far-off KKK group came out ahead. Hard to say, but that would just add to the overall negative experience as it could only serve to make similar fiascos in the future more likely. It was very bad, all the way around. Though we can claim a win (after a ridiculous length of time, suffering, national ridicule, and posing for cameras) that it was finished.

While I will readily admit that Kennett, like all communities, has an element of evil racism, anyone who thinks of this city as "racially charged" has certainly not traveled much. Yet, that is our image now for as long as this silly incident is remembered.

-- Posted by fervor on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, at 2:44 PM

Rosenblum calls her a strong lady. There are two errors in his statement. Rosenbloom interpretation of strong must be "hot headed Bigot". And,#2, She is no lady. Race card rejected,reason: insufficient funds.

-- Posted by plumdog on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, at 10:49 PM

Darcy, I'd like to know what color your world is. You cannot be on this planet and sincerely think Heather Ellis is blameless in this situation or that any of the other parties set her up or need to be fired and/or sued. Ms. Ellis is as guilty as O.J.; another race-baiting thug. Please stay in La-La Land, on the left coast, where eeeeeeevil corporations, such as Wal-Mart, are viewed with disdain for providing a community with good paying jobs, affordable goods, tax revenues, and support of community activities.

-- Posted by arbyrd01 on Tue, Nov 24, 2009, at 9:39 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.