icell phones
Kennett, Missouri · Tuesday, February 9, 2010
[Nameplate] Mostly Cloudy ~ 26°F  
High: 25°F ~ Low: 17°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (8) Share link

NAACP sponsors weekend 'peace rally' at Courthouse Square

Tuesday, June 16, 2009
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) sponsored a peace rally in protest of what it called "police brutality and injustice" on Saturday, June 13, in the Downtown District of Kennett.

The peace rally/march was organized by Luetta Pulliam-Wright of Kennett, and was scheduled to begin at the Victory Temple Church of God in Christ located at 921 North Main Street, where it would then proceed to Commercial Street, then on to College Avenue, before coming to a stop at the Courthouse Square.

According to statements made by Pulliam-Wright prior to the event, the rally was intended to serve all citizens of Dunklin County and the surrounding area, highlighting the importance of civil rights and protesting alleged police brutality and injustice regarding a local case filed January 7, 2007.

A probable cause affidavit filed in January by an officer with the Kennett Police Department claims that on January 6, 2007 authorities responded to a call from store management and a security officer at the local Wal-mart store.

The call, according to the court document, was in reference to an incident involving a woman, later identified as Heather R. Ellis, whom Wal-mart officials say they asked to leave the store after she became belligerent, angry, and hostile, cursing in an aggressive manner toward store employees.

The affidavit also indicates that after police arrived on the scene, Ellis continued to act in the same manner, refusing to leave the premises, and later directed her anger toward the officers responding to the call, even threatening assault if they tried to force her to leave.

Numerous requests were made by police for Ellis to leave the store on her own free will, according to the court document. However, the responding officers testified in a written account of the incident that Ellis continued to be combative, refusing to comply with the requests for her to leave peacefully.

One of the responding officers reported that he asked Ellis once more to leave peacefully, explaining that if she did not, he would be forced to place her under arrest. According to that officer, Ellis refused again, and threatened physical harm to him if he tried to arrest her.

"Heather Ellis was given every opportunity to comply with the officers repeated requests for her to simply leave the property of the business of Wal-mart," the officer wrote in his statement.

The officer explained in the affidavit that once it became "abundantly clear" that the subject had "no intention of cooperating" with police, she was informed that she was being placed under arrest. At this time, the officer struggled to place handcuffs on Ellis because she became even more combative, according to police.

The affidavit indicates that Ellis' refusal to comply with the arrest resulted in two additional officers coming to the arresting officer's aid. Ellis was described by these officers to be swinging, fighting, and kicking throughout the incident, while the three officers attempted to place her in handcuffs.

According to the court document, during the incident, Ellis reportedly kicked one of the officers, prior to striking a second arresting officer in the mouth. Once subdued, Ellis was transported to the Dunklin County Jail where she was processed, booked, and incarcerated.

Supporters of Ellis were in strong force during the rally on Saturday, calling her a victim, and accusing local authorities of misconduct, character assassination, falsifying public records, blatant threats and perceived buy-offs.

According to family members of Ellis, the accusations made by the arresting officers and those representing Wal-mart are inaccurate and completely false. During the rally, this position was made evident, as speakers and protesters rallied in Ellis' favor, and held up signs that read: 'Free Heather Ellis!'

Ellis, is not currently incarcerated on the charges she faces, but is expected in court for a jury trial set to begin on June 29.

According to Dunklin County Prosecuting Attorney Stephen P. Sokoloff, Ellis is currently charged with peace disturbance, in addition to resisting arrest and two counts of assault on a law enforcement officer in the second degree.

Although Saturday's rally was expected to begin at 9 a.m., with marchers arriving at the Courthouse Square shortly after, protesters were not present until after noon.

According to organizers, there was a short delay and change of plans, which also included the elimination of original plans to continue the march from Kennett's Downtown District, through First Street to the area in front of Wal-mart.

Local authorities revealed that prior to the event beginning, officers setting up for the rally discovered approximately 100 Ku Klux Klan cards scattered throughout the planned route, including areas down College Avenue.

Major Steve Williams said his department worked diligently to insure that all of the derogatory items were removed from the scene and also contact the coordinator of the event to make the group aware of the situation.

Police also told the Daily Dunklin Democrat that it increased its security measures during the rally, to provide additional precautionary protection for the approximate 50 protesters and witnesses in attendance.

Williams said the event went on without further incident and the department is investigating the incident regarding the cards that were found before the rally which ended by 4 p.m.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on dddnews.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

WHOA! This second item (today's edition) that is covering this 'peace' march puts a entirely different light on considering how to state one's feelings.

I just reread the first news item from the DDDs last reporting (last friday, June 12) and I think that the true purpose of this march should have been stated fully the first time it was reported in the DDD.

I am thinking that the DDD would have reported the true intention of the march if they (the DDD) had known the facts regarding what is being reported now, today.

When I read the first article I ASSUMED that the march was taking place because it was a genuine appeal for 'peace' and a condemnation of police misconduct in GENERAL as the first article made no mention of the march being directed toward the Kennett Police Department and did not mention any trial that will be taking place June 29th (less tha two weeks from now).

This begs the question of:

If any of those attending the 'peace march'on Saturday is called to sit on a jury concerning this case, won't they be eliminated as a prospective juror because they attended this 'peace march'? I cannot see how anyone that actually attended and participated in the march can claim impartiality of the case.

It is too bad that the true purpose of the march wasn't revealed until today. In this light then, I DOUBLE congratulate all residents (both black residents and white residents) for going about their business as usual last Saturday and not taking part in the proceedings.

I can hardly see how this can go before a JURY in Kennett on June 29th without questions being raised about being impartial about what has been heard regarding this 'peace march' true purpose.

At least this whole fiasco proves one thing..., (if anything), and that is; Kennett residents (all the residents (of all races and color) that make up Kennett)) prove themselves very savvy when they decide NOT to be duped by others. Good for Kennett!

-- Posted by Ruth on Tue, Jun 16, 2009, at 5:44 PM

Equal protection under the law implies that a member of no race is immune from the law. The Kennett Police Department is not racist. Nor are the members of the force psychiatrists. The woman's behavior suggests to me that she has serious mental problems. So, for her own protection and for the protection of the public, the police attempted to do the right thing. Finally, I don't know how Ms. Pulliam-Wright became anointed the Reverend Al Sharpton of Kennett. Ms. Pulliam-Wright has a ways to go if she wants to become a world class grotesque liar, and rabble-rouser, such as the Reverend Al Sharpton.

-- Posted by Skeptisch on Tue, Jun 16, 2009, at 6:05 PM

If you ever had any dealings with this KPD of any kind rather making a complaint to being under arrest you will see for yourself just how well they protect and serve.

-- Posted by P Jam on Tue, Jun 16, 2009, at 8:43 PM

Isn't this just a court matter now? A jury gets to hear the evidence and decide the fate of Ms. Ellis. Do the protesters think she won't get a fair trial in Dunklin County? That's odd. I've never heard that before. I suspect there's more afoot here. Maybe Ms. Pulliam has some political aspirations or is related to, or friends with, the defendant. Friends and relatives of an accused usually don't believe the evidence against the accused is true. The NAACP should march where there is true injustice, but Kennett? Ms. Ellis will have her day in court. Isn't that all any of us should expect under our system of government?

-- Posted by br549 on Wed, Jun 17, 2009, at 7:01 PM

oh yeah,Kennett court system ranks right up there with the Keystone Cops.

-- Posted by P Jam on Wed, Jun 17, 2009, at 7:31 PM

Deanna, will you or someone else from the DDD be covering this trial? It is rumored that the June 29th date (for the start of the trial) has been delayed and postponed for a later date.

Will the DDD be covering this trial in real time, (as it takes place)?

Do you know if there will be a jury selected or will it be tried before a Judge, and Will the general public (residents of Kennett) be allowed to be in attendance for the trial?

-- Posted by Ruth on Thu, Jul 2, 2009, at 3:59 PM

KPD is so racist. I have a brother that has just been recently charged with the same thing. Everytime they arrest someone they say that they are resisting arrest and assalting a police officer. My brother was black and he was jumped on by the KPD and they are now holding him on a very high bond. I pray that KPD will finally get whats coming to them because I do believe that the majority of them are KKK that stick together. I am going to join forces with Ms. Pulliam and the FBI and the US justice department to make sure that injustices does not continue to happen in Kennett mo.

-- Posted by somebodycares on Thu, Oct 15, 2009, at 6:54 PM

Well, a family member of mine, here in California, is circulating a petition concerning this Heather Ellis matter, and I decided to check the Kennett hometown newspaper. I should be respectful of your indigenous history, but I can't get beyond the fact that you have an active branch of the KKK infesting your community, and that scuttlebutt links it with your local constabulary. Classic, old history repeats, or never goes away. Makes me long for the Civil War all over again, regardless of the eventual disposition of Ellis' case in court.

-- Posted by aitengri on Sat, Oct 17, 2009, at 12:51 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.