![]() The Case IH 625 cotton picker unloads a cotton module on a farm near Steele, Mo. Staff photo by Lyman Skyles [Click to enlarge] |
Both farm equipment giants now have harvesting equipment available that not only picks cotton but bales it as well. Beyond that, the similarity of the equipment ends as both employ different strategies.
Case IH produces a module that is one-half the size of conventional modules, while John Deere produces a round bale.
![]() The John Deere 7760 harvests cotton, building round modules. Completed modules appear in the foreground. Photo provided [Click to enlarge] |
"The new system reduces the manpower and equipment needed for harvesting cotton," said David Williams, sales manager for Baker Farm Equipment. "It will revolutionize the industry."
Williams said Case IH had experimented with both round and square bale systems in the past, but decided to go with the more familiar module concept, although the module produced is half the size of the conventional module--8x8x16 ft instead of 8x8x32 ft.
"The premise of going with the module was not to reinvent the wheel," Williams said. "They did quite a bit of experimenting before deciding on the smaller but conventional module concept."
The modules formed by the 625 can be as small as 4,000 pounds and as large as 12,000 pounds. Available yield monitor lets the operator to keep track of yields on the go, how much cotton is in the basket and to plan drop off points for completed modules.
The smaller modules can be handled with conventional module trucks (two modules will fit in the truck) and gins can handle the modules in the same fashion they do the larger ones.
Williams said after being deposited in the field the modules can be covered with a reusable tarp as with the conventional modules.
He said Baker Implement has eight harvesters in its sales territory this season. That was the number of machines it was allotted this season as production was limited. Case IH will be in full production next season.
Jeff Bazzell, vice president of Bazzell and Wilder, said John Deere decided to develop the round bale system because it would allow virtual non-stop harvesting.
"As the cotton is picked, it is moved to an accumulator, much the same way as cotton would move to the basket of a traditional picker. Once the accumulator is full, the cotton is dumped into the round module chamber where it is formed into a round module and wrapped in a protective covering, ejected onto a retractable gate at the rear of the machine with the push of a button it can be dropped in place in the field without stopping allowing the farmer to continue picking cotton."
The round modules can be 36- to 90- inches in diameter and 8 feet long.
Not having to stop to eject a module increases harvesting efficiency from "70 percent to around 90 percent," Bazzell said.
Bazzell and Wilder had one 7760 in operation this season. He said Charles Parker of Senath used a 7760 and was able to harvest 145 acres of cotton, averaging about three bales an acre, in one 16-hour day.
John Deere says the only special equipment a producer may need is a tractor mounted round module handler for staging the modules and lifting them onto a flatbed trailer. Four of the round modules can be fitted into a standard module truck with only slight modification of the conveyor chain.
The company said its system provides such benefits as reduced waste and improved quality preservation all due to the fact the round modules are wrapped with a special protective covering meaning no more loss during transport, or from water wicking up from the ground.
Both systems eliminate the need of a module builder, boll buggies and reduce manpower requirements.
The Case IH ME 625 weighs in around 51,000 pounds, is powered by a 550 cubic inch six cylinder diesel engine producing 365 horsepower. The company said its 200 gallon fuel tank is sufficient for a 12-hour day.
The John Deere 7760 weighs 67,667 pounds, is powered by a 824 cubic inch six cylinder diesel engine producing 500 hp. It has a 300 gallon fuel tank which the company says allows up to 12 hours continuous operation.















THE GOOD OLE COTTON PICKIN DAY'S. I REMEMBER PICKING COTTON FOR MY UNCLE RILEY HAYES. OUR CLOTHES GOT WET FROM THE DEW AND MORNINGS WERE A LITTLE CHILLY. THE SUN CAME OUT AND DRYED US UP AS WELL AS THE COTTON. $3.00 A HUNDRED LB. YES THE COTTON ALWAYS WEIGHED MORE IN THE MORNINGS. EVERYBODY DRANK WATER FROM THE SAME WATER JUG AND USED THE SAME LADEL. I STARTED OUT USING A TOESACK AND GRAUDATED TO THE BIGGER SACK. WE WORE JERSEY GLOVES WITH THE FINGER TIPS CUT OUT SO THE SHARP BOWS WOULDN'T CUT UP OUR FINGERS SO BAD. UNCLE RILEY DIDN'T LIKE YOU TO PULL BOWS AND NO LEAVES. AT LUNCH WE ALL HAD A CAN OF VIENNA WINIES AND A MOON PIE THAT WE TOOK WITH US. WE ALWAYS TRIED TO PUT IN 8 HR DAY'S. MY BROTHERS PICKED 500 LB A DAY. THOSE WERE THE GOOD OLE DAY'S FOR SURE. I LIVE IN MICHIGAN NOW AND ALOT OF PEOPLE UP HERE HAVE NEVER SEEN A COTTON FIELD!
I remember the cotton fields well. Split summer vacations to chop cotton the first half and to pick cotton the second half. One thing I remember is the wet dew in the morning and the way it made your fingers sting from the dew getting in the cuts made by the cotton bow. However, the frist sack in the morning always weighted heavier. Three cents a pound, what away to make a living.
When I was sixteen I started working at the cotton gin with my father (where he lost his life), but the memories will live forever.
if anyone would like to communicate, you can reach me at Tonymontgomery50@yahoo.com
IT WAS HARD WORK-BUT HONEST WORK!!!!!!!!
I am looking for one of those 7-9 foot sacks to buy and use Eny body have one are know where thy
sale them David Carnley 850-547-5607 850-527-2295
ddcarnley08@gmail.com
Great memories of the 1950s---picking cotton by hand just prior to the advent of the great machines. My lack of success at this occupation helped convince me to go to college and move on...
In responce to jc(whoa2moa) tue nov 6 2007 5:22 a m.
Yes,I do remember those days,with the 9 feet cotton sacks, also 7 feet for the younger persons.average between 100lbs-300lbs a day, depending on how THICK the cotton was, at 3 cent a lbs,Formerly of Gobler.
Ok you guy's--be patient with me. I am new at this.
I am doing geneolgy for our family and my Mom talks about the "bootheel" "Dunklin County"
"picking Cotton" until the cotton picking machines were manufactured (1943??). She said they sold the land because it was sandy and the machines would pull the whole plant out.
Anyway---
Any info, pictures and the whatnot would be greatly appreciated
My husband is a gin manager and some of his farmers, who were lucky enough to irrigate averaged 3-4 bale an acre. I watched the round module unwrapper at Farmers Union in Senath. It is an awesome piece of equipment. The round modules will also help cut down on wet modules from rain. This equipment might be expensive but in a few years someone could definitely reap some rewards.
elvisjj: ;-)
that's funny ;-)
With this new technology and the hefty price tag that comes with it, can area farmers actually justify buying one with cotton crops averaging 1/2 an acre this season? Maybe Southeast farmers aren't doing as bad as they claim. You would have to "Show Me" any cotton fields that averaged 3 bales and acre this season!
I STILL THINK OF THE GOOD OLE DAYS. WHEN WE USED THE 9 FOOT SACK TO PUT THE COTTON IN AND DRAG BEHIND US AND WHEN FULL, CARRY IT TO THE WAGON, WEIGH IT, AND DUMP IT.
YOU REMEMBER THOSE DAYS. JC in st louis.
IE bragg city
What illegal immigrant problem? Are you suggesting our local farmers knowingly employ illegal immigrants, i.e., Mexicans, to work the fields?
The John Deere looks great & the specs are good-the
bootheel farmers need all the help they can get-
This is good new! Now if we could get more fruit picker technology, we could solve this illegal immigrant problem!