|
Kennett, Missouri ~ Sunday, September 7, 2008
| Blogs |
|
|
Interesting inaction
Posted Wednesday, April 23, 2008, at 6:01 AM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
I have watched with interest the inaction the Kennett District No. 39 school board has taken in its last two meetings. I am fascinated by this interesting twist of inaction.
In 2007, Kennett District No. 39 Superintendent Jerry Noble was named the recipient of the Allen Oakley Educator of the Year Award. Obviously, most in the community believe that Noble is doing an excellent job leading the district. His reputation is very credible and his leadership skills were rewarded. At the March board meeting, after investigating some actions that members of his own administration had taken and determining that errors had been made, Noble attempted to rectify those errors. Therefore, he recommended that the board approve an action that, in the judgment of he and his administration, would set things as close to right as possible. At that meeting the board discussed Noble's recommendation but took no action. No motion was made and no second was made. Consequently, board members would not vote either "yes" or "no." Obviously, the board's inaction was itself a vote, but it appears that no board member wanted to "go on record" as voting against Noble's recommendation. I realize that my assessment might be incorrect, but their inaction regarding the superintendent's recommendation is interesting. At April's board meeting, after further investigation and after learning more facts about the situation, Noble came to the board again with the same recommendation he had made in March. Once again, however, no motion was made and, consequently, no second was made, and, again, the board took an interesting inaction regarding a topic that their superintendent obviously thought warranted action. I know the members of the board are very good people and do the very best they can to properly and effectively handle the district's business. I simply find it interesting that they took no action regarding their superintendent's recommendation and simply let it slide. NOTE: Although I attend each meeting of the board, sometimes the talk around the table is so quiet that I do not hear all of it from where I sit. Apparently, I missed the fact that a motion was actually made in the March meeting to allow a vote on Mr. Noble's recommendation. There was no second, however, and so the issue was dropped until the April meeting. At the April meeting there was neither a motion or a second. Sorry about that! Comments Showing most recent comments first [Show in chronological order instead] |
Hot topics Observations -- Embarrassed...(21 ~ 12:03 PM, Sep 3)
Wall E -- not!
Observations - Are we paying attention?
Observations -- Are there theological, philosophical reasons for leaving?
Observations -- We voted for change...
Mailing list
Enter your email address to join our daily headline mailing list: |
Everyone should have been informed and allowed to enter the weighted classes that were offered. However, this did not occur. Two students were allowed, some qualified students were told no and the rest didn't know that they could even ask to take the classes until it was too late. Limiting the number would have given the majority in this class an opportunity to possibly catch up. They only have two years to take seven weighted classes while the one student has already taken two and one other has one under their belt. Unfair... you betcha. Mr Noble offered a possible way to even the playing field and twice the board refused to act. Why? Who knows...It seemed like a no brainer to me and others. Maybe we have the wrong people on the board. We should have people that will look out for all children.
I am not sure what the issue is here? If it is concerning the weighted class or here in claremont, ca we refer to them as AP (advance placement)classes...then all students who QUALIFY are allowed and encouraged to take AP classes. There are no exceptions!!!Students are not limited to the number of AP classes they may take. They must meet a qualifing standard grade the prior year to, then they may elect to take the class or NOT to take the class. Considering the importance of class rank to college admitance being so highly competitive, AP classes must be offered to ALL who meet the schools qualifications for those special classes. Any issues of unfairness would be considered unethical! Not to mention highly unfair and discriminatory of students who were not given the same opportunities. Maybe I am misunderstanding the issue......??